AddThis SmartLayers

MP who claimed weekly’s story was ‘not news’ has IPSO complaint thrown out

Bill WigginA Tory MP who claimed a weekly newspaper’s story about him was “not news” has had his complain thrown out by the press watchdog.

Bill Wiggin, MP for North Herefordshire, went to the Independent Press Standards Organisation over a story in the Hereford Times which reported he was “facing questions of morality over his decision to be a managing director of an offshore financial company.”

As a result of the article’s publication, Mr Wiggin said that people in his constituency had been misled by the article into believing that he was implicated in the ‘Paradise Papers’, which were made public on 5 November 2017 and detailed allegations of legal tax avoidance against a number of individuals.

He had received a number of letters following the Times’s article, published four days later, from constituents he claimed had been “misled” by the piece.

The story stated that “figures disclosing how much the county’s MPs earn from outside financial interests have been revealed in the most recent register released by parliament”, and that this register had shown that Mr Wiggin was “a director of two fund platforms in the Caymans and two in Bermuda.”

In his complaint to IPSO under Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice, Mr Wiggin also said that it was inaccurate to say that his outside earnings had been “revealed” in the latest Register of Members’ Financial Interests, where his entry had been largely unchanged for 9 months, and where the latest update did not reveal anything new about the “offshore” aspects of his earnings.

He argued that the subject of the article was not therefore “news”, as the article merely repeated information which the newspaper had already reported on.

Denying a breach of Code, the Times said that the article had not made reference to the Paradise Papers story, and nothing linking this to Mr Wiggin had been implied.

The newspaper added that the story was being prepared prior to the publication of the Paradise Papers, on the basis of a suggestion from a manager that publications look into the Register of Members’ Financial Interests as a source of stories, and that this timing was purely coincidental.

The reference to the information being “revealed” was justified, the Times said, because it was entitled to update its readers on their MP’s outside interests.

Mr Wiggin had used his weekly column in the paper to rebut the allegations on 7 December and he was invited to publish a letter or further column setting out his position.

IPSO found that the story did not imply that Mr Wiggin was involved in the tax avoidance practices revealed in the Paradise Papers, and that the use of the word “revealed” in the story did not represent a significant inaccuracy.

The complaint was not upheld, and the full adjudication can be read here.

6 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • April 10, 2018 at 9:00 am
    Permalink

    As the old saying goes: “If you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to worry about.”

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(12)
  • April 10, 2018 at 10:25 am
    Permalink

    I love the bit about the “suggestion by a manager” that the HT check the register of members’ interests – and then they get all excited and “reveal” it. That same paper carried a press release from Wiggin himself announcing his nice little earner a few years ago. Never mind the register, check your archive!

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(9)
  • April 10, 2018 at 11:50 am
    Permalink

    Another example of politicians’ arrogance – it’s certainly not for them to determine what is news and what isn’t. This man has a column in the paper, for goodness sake, and used it to rebut local misunderstandings Relations between him and the paper must be pretty poor if he took his complaint to IPSO, and he has only made a fool of himself. High time for the editor to review his content and drop the Bill Wiggin column for a start…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(6)
  • April 10, 2018 at 1:13 pm
    Permalink

    story in weekly paper not news? sounds about right in these days of websites and skeleton staff levels.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(5)
  • April 10, 2018 at 4:46 pm
    Permalink

    Notme. I like that. At least the paper was willing to have a go. Anyone know of a local paper that has shoved bad news about its pet MP under carpet? I thought not.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)

House rules Add a comment

You now need to be logged-in to our site in order to comment on stories. Please login or register using the buttons below or login via Facebook or Twitter.

Register