AddThis SmartLayers

ABCs: Trinity Mirror websites score a 1-2-3 for online growth

Trinity Mirror’s regional daily websites claimed the top three places for year-on-year growth in the latest ABC Figures.

The North Wales Daily Post, Liverpool Echo and Wales Online posted the largest increase in daily average unique browsers in the second half of 2015, compared with the same period the previous year.

The Daily Post averaged 77,177 unique browsers, representing an 82.3pc rise, while the Echo showed a 59.6pc increase with 422,360.

The Lancashire Evening Post’s website was the highest-placed Johnston Press companion site, with 34,146 daily average unique browsers representing a 44.2pc year-on-year increase.

The Daily Post's website topped the table for online growth

The Daily Post’s website topped the table for online growth

Archant’s Norwich Evening News and Newsquest-owned Glasgow daily the Evening Times earned themselves fifth and sixth positions in the table, with increase of 42.9pc for the former and 41.4pc for the latter.

However, the Evening Times’s sister daily The Herald, Glasgow, whose website features a metered paywall, saw a 17.2pc decline in daily average unique browsers.

The Herald was one of only two regional daily websites to experience year-on-year decline, with The Scotsman seeing a 48pc fall.

However, owner Johnston Press says the decline is down to its figures previously being reported together with those of the Edinburgh Evening News. The two title’s figures are now submitted separately.

Overall, Trinity Mirror’s regional network recorded the highest number of daily unique browsers with 1,966,267 – a 40.1pc rise.

Local World sites experienced a 19.7pc increase, with Newsquest at 16.7pc an Johnston Press at 9.5pc also experiencing rises.

The Bristol Post was the best performing Local World website, with a 97,261 average representing a 37.7pc increase.

The full list of audience figures for regional publisher online networks is as follows:

Publisher Network Daily average unique browsers Y-on-Y percentage change
Trinity Mirror Regionals 1,966,267 40.1
Kent Online (KM Group) 116,691 33.4
Midland News Association 169,993 21.1
Local World 1,262,144 19.7
Newsquest Media Group 1,282,822 16.7
Johnston Press 1,041,142 9.5

The full list of audience figures for individual newspaper online platforms is as follows:

Website Daily average unique browsers Y-on-Y percentage change
North Wales Daily Post 77,177 82.3
Liverpool Echo 422,360 59.6
Wales Online 258,964 45.2
Lancashire Evening Post 34,146 44.2
Norwich Evening News 15,559 42.9
Glasgow Evening Times 50,622 41.4
Eastern Daily Press 61,315 40.7
Teesside Gazette 101,305 40.3
Bristol Post 97,261 37.7
Bradford Telegraph & Argus 69,307 37.2
Huddersfield Daily Examiner 52,772 35.9
Birmingham Mail 196,824 35
Manchester Evening News 558,095 34.5
The Star, Sheffield 68,557 33.1
Leicester Mercury 72,769 31
Newcastle Live 203,436 30.5
Nottingham Post 76,103 29.9
Coventry Telegraph 56,067 29.1
Ipswich Star 20,227 28
Lancashire Telegraph 51,314 27.4
Derby Telegraph 71,415 26.8
News Shopper, South London 36,897 26.5
Hull Daily Mail 91,942 24
Swindon Advertiser 30,912 22.4
Sunderland Echo 49,552 21.4
Express and Star, Wolverhampton 124,818 21.3
Stoke Sentinel 73,637 20
Scunthorpe Telegraph 28,561 19.7
Peterborough Telegraph 22,408 19.7
Gloucester Citizen/Gloucestershire Echo 33,298 19.1
Shropshire Star 50,042 18.1
South Wales Evening Post 57,703 17.9
East Anglian Daily Times 21,518 17.9
Yorkshire Evening Post 75,860 17.5
The Northern Echo 58,663 17
The Press, York 46,199 16.5
The Argus, Brighton 53,387 14.2
Grimsby Telegraph 38,919 13.7
Southern Daily Echo 72,737 13.5
Plymouth Herald 65,460 11.2
The Gazette, Blackpool 34,649 11.2
Oxford Mail 30,216 10.3
Cambridge News 42,563 8.4
Lincolnshire Echo 26,730 7.5
Yorkshire Post 31,420 7.1
The News, Portsmouth 43,197 6.5
The Bolton News 51,252 4.5
The Herald, Glasgow 79,835 -17.2
Scotsman 94,928 -48
Edinburgh Evening News 54,689 N/A
Northampton Chronicle & Echo 31,474 N/A
Shields Gazette 24,774 N/A
Wigan Evening Post 21,748 N/A
Hartlepool Mail 20,864 N/A
Southport Visiter 12,772 N/A
Belfast News Letter 12,178 N/A
The Comet, Stevenage 10,266 N/A
Romford Recorder 9,010 N/A
Brent and Kilburn Times 8,117 N/A
Great Yarmouth Mercury 6,940 N/A
Welwyn Hatfield Times 6,776 N/A
Barking & Dagenham Post 6,565 N/A
The Herts Advertiser 5,707 N/A
Ham and High Express 5,486 N/A
Ilford Recorder 5,304 N/A
Newham Recorder 4,504 N/A
Islington Gazette 4,399 N/A
Lowestoft Journal 4,375 N/A
Hunts Post 4,244 N/A
Hackney Gazette 3,336 N/A
Kent on Sunday 3,274 N/A
Cambs Times 2,984 N/A
Wisbech Standard 2,915 N/A
Docklands & East London Advertiser 2,339 N/A
North Norfolk News 2,099 N/A
The Reporter 1,493 N/A

13 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • February 24, 2016 at 2:06 pm
    Permalink

    Which translates to what in terms of paying bills?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(14)
  • February 24, 2016 at 3:24 pm
    Permalink

    Christopher Gage asks the only question worth asking. All of these organisations are businesses existing to make money. So where’s the money in the above lists? Is TM Regionals the place to be – full of well-rewarded operatives, secure in their jobs, reaping rises and bonuses? And if it isn’t what do these numbers mean?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(11)
  • February 24, 2016 at 4:51 pm
    Permalink

    So with these seemingly unbelievable figures, coupled with equally dramatic declines in print, why don’t they go digital only? The answer is because they’re still not making any real money.
    And the web traffic is super inflated by clickbait Facebook postings, usually sub Daily Star standard – which attract comments in their million by morons.
    BTW The whole business of allowing comments on live court cases is perhaps the biggest shame of our regional press.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(11)
  • February 24, 2016 at 6:14 pm
    Permalink

    The same questions about to be asked as was asked previously this week by others
    1- what does this mean in revenue terms to the business?
    2- please show revenues which we can all understand as opposed to meaningless web traffic stats
    3- are the company bosses happy that this reflects an increase in the giving away of the products ( news and content for free) whilst the print titles all slip further losing hundreds of readers alongside these web ‘increases’

    In the case of the EDP at Archant with a staggering copy sale ABC of under 39k shouldn’t they be more concerned and focused on growing paid for print sales as opposed to meaningless online figures

    Any answers?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(20)
  • February 25, 2016 at 11:08 am
    Permalink

    Please could Archant publish the viewing figures for ( tries not to laugh) Mustard tv?

    We’ve been asking for ages so there must be some reason why all their other print, digital and social media stats are available but not the figures for their telly station, please tell us

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(10)
  • February 25, 2016 at 11:42 am
    Permalink

    Boast. Boast. Boast. But no money figures. I think we have seen all this before and know what it means.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(1)
  • February 25, 2016 at 11:50 am
    Permalink

    If these stats are valued by the main regional press group bean counters who are running things these days,will they be bold enough to convert all their ailing newsprint products to online only?
    It would cut huge costs and overheads in one fell swoop which must be a good thing?

    Paper sales are falling through the floor yet page impressions and unique browsers are on the increase, surely that’s the answer to the problem of cutting costs and growing digital isn’t it?
    The only slight issue is these UB numbers are useless to a business as there’s no revenue attached to them,It’s purely an indication of who’s taking a look in the shop window for free but not paying for anything.

    until someone monetises their online news sites the free lookers will increase while those choosing to pay will decline, it’s just not something I would be keen to shout about if I were them.
    And that my friends is the real state of the regional press in 2016
    Give it away and we’ll have it, pay for it? no thanks

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(8)
  • February 25, 2016 at 2:41 pm
    Permalink

    When the print ABCs are published, how come nobody ever pipes up in the comments saying: ‘Which translates to what in terms of paying bills?’
    Surely everything – ad sales, circulation numbers, digital figures etc – needs to be considered in the round.
    Digital figures like these, taken as standalone, surely deserve some congratulations handing out for the hard work that’s gone into achieving them – these websites didn’t just grow by themselves.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • February 25, 2016 at 4:49 pm
    Permalink

    The Manchester Evening News 550,000 plus unique browsers. Sounds like a fabulous success story until you turn the clock back 40 years when the print circulation peaked at 404,000, and those people had to make the effort to buy the paper!

    Proof if any were needed that the regional press has failed to keep up with changing demographics, reader habits and lifestyles in modern Britain over those 40 years. A sad case of complacency killing the cat.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • February 29, 2016 at 6:28 am
    Permalink

    @ISAAC
    no business is a charity so meaningless numbers of people looking at a regional press website is irrelevant.
    ABC figures are directly aligned to revenue as they show the number of copies of a paper ‘bought’ and usually a difference y/y, that indicates whether more people are buying the product or less, it’s easy to see

    with online stats such as pi or uv it simply shows who’s looked not how much money has been achieved as a result and in any business all that matters is revenue.
    If you’re trying to sell your car are you interested in how many people have looked at it or whether anyone’s bought it?

    Until someone publishes online revenues against y/y revenues non one will take them seriously and all the hard work that’s gone into it will sadly count for nothing.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(1)
  • February 29, 2016 at 11:54 am
    Permalink

    @RICHARD
    ABCs don’t directly show how much the ads have been sold for.
    They’re just as useful (useless?) as figures which show how many page impressions have been made on a website to generate income.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
Take part in our Reader Survey here