AddThis SmartLayers

Weekly steps up bid to save scandal-hit hospital

A weekly newspaper has stepped up its fight to save services at a scandal-hit hospital where hundreds of avoidable deaths are thought to have occurred.

Stafford Hospital is facing being stripped of a number of services including intensive care, maternity and A&E following a damning independent report which described its standard of care as “truly dreadful.”

But the Staffordshire Newsletter has thrown itself into a fight to save services at the hospital, publishing an eight-page supplement ahead of a huge march in the town on Saturday.

It claims the hospital, where up to 1,200 patient deaths are thought to have occurred as a result of the “appalling” quality of care, is being made a scapegoat for wider problems in the NHS.

Editor Killoran Wills said: “This is a hugely important issue for people in Stafford – but Saturday was just the beginning. There is a long way to go to safeguard the services that we need in Stafford.”

During the march, reporter Robin Scott posted pictures and tweets throughout the afternoon, assisted by Rosamond Evans who was on a work experience placement, while digital assistant Leah Cassidy produced a six minute video of the march and photographer Chantale Lemaitre took 600 pictures on the day.

The 1,782-page report by Robert Francis QC found that patients were left lying in their own urine and excrement for days, forced to drink water from vases, given the wrong medication or sent home with life-threatening conditions.

However in its editorial, the paper claims the hospital was a “convenient target” for wider problems in health care.

It said: “Another week, another report and another Stafford Hospital headline… well it’s about time the long-playing record stopped. Enough is enough.

“This week the government announced sweeping reforms of the NHS. Yes they were prompted by the inquiry into unforgiveable treatment meted out at Stafford Hospital, but if ours was the only hospital at fault why should it need government legislation to put things right?

“Clearly the whole of the NHS has been found wanting and yet the fingers still seem to point exclusively at Stafford. Why? Because we are an easy and convenient target to blame for the ills of the NHS.

“Well, we will not be the scapegoat for the whole country to hide behind any more. Our town hospital has faced up to facts, put its house in order and deserves huge credit for what it has achieved in the full glare of national publicity. It is the turn of others to play catch up.”


You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • April 23, 2013 at 10:29 am

    The Newsletter’s campaign is deserving of wide praise. As someone who has worked as a volunteer in the health service for many years as well as being a journalist it is clear that all of us need to bind together to prevent Stafford and Cannock from closing. The trouble started with the Labour Govt pushing Stafford to go for foundation status when it had lost all three of its stars. From then on the powers that be just wanted to save money at the expense of patients. This was borne out by them not wanting lay people on the board, just accountants and solicitors – and many were just people who had moved into the area to retire! Keep up the excellent work!! Ken Jackson

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 23, 2013 at 10:36 am

    Well done the Newsletter doing the job that for times memorial has been the role of weekly newspapers. It is vitally important that both Stafford and Cannock are kept open……….harness the power of the people!

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 23, 2013 at 3:07 pm

    Hmm think the Newsletter – and in turn HTFP – are muddling two distinctly different issues here.

    Not saying they’re a good thing but as I understand it, the axeing of services at Stafford is down to its financial pressures and the trend for centralising services into bigger, higher-profile hospitals which is being seen across the country. It’s not a direct consequence of the Francis report and all the accompanying publicity.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)