Newspaper relied on account of person who was not in stadium
The Press Complaints Commission was set up in 1991 to ensure that British newspapers and magazines follow the letter and spirit of the Editor’s Code of Practice which deals with ethical issues such as inaccuracy, privacy, misrepresentation and harassment. The PCC was replaced by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) in 2014.
Most complaints are resolved directly by editors to the satisfaction of those complaining. ISPO adjudicates formally on the remainder, with all critical adjudications published in full by the publications involved.
We aim to cover all IPSO adjudications on HoldtheFrontPage, and you will find them here.
Defendant said she did not have chance to disguise or cover her face
Reporter used false name to access event
Newspaper presented claims as fact, IPSO finds
Error was rectified during print run
Plus: Round up of recent cases heard by press watchdog
IPSO finds consent not given for use in context of court report
Witnesses had used term to describe him in court
Defendant father and son went to press watchdog over claims
Column prompted cousin to complain to press watchdog
IPSO finds use of “charged” was inaccurate
Dead man’s brother complained over story
Press watchdog finds in head teacher’s favour
IPSO sides with property company after complaint
CEO replaced on acting basis by operations director
Newspaper said it had reported councillor’s remarks accurately