AddThis SmartLayers

Regional publisher in U-turn over subbing hub headline-writing move

NewsquestPlans to transfer headline-writing from a regional publisher’s subbing hub to individual local offices have been shelved, HTFP has learned.

Last week we reported that Newsquest was asking local editors to take back responsibility for writing headlines, subheads and straplines from the group’s production hubs in Newport and Weymouth.

The changes, which had been due to take effect on 4 January, were set to be made after some editors within the group claimed to be changing “80pc or more” of headlines written at the hubs.

However it has now emerged that the proposals have been shelved indefinitely and that the hubs will continue to have responsibility for headline writing.

No official company announcement has been made on the move, and Newsquest has yet to respond to HTFP’s request for a comment on the issue.

However it is understood that editors have been told verbally that the plans have been shelved and the hubs will continue to write headlines.

One Newsquest staffer told HTFP:  “The official line is that the plans have been ‘postponed’ indefinitely, though there is speculation that they will not be carried out for a long time, if ever.”

It means the publisher is set to retain its current system of the hubs adding headlines after being sent pages by Newsquest titles from across the country.

The original plan came to light in an email sent to Newsquest’s regional editors and managing directors before Christmas by group production director Leighton Jones.

It said: “In order to create a more efficient workflow and address the concerns of some of you that you change 80pc or more of the headlines that are supplied, it has been decided that headlines, subheads and straplines on stories will no longer be written in the copy-editing hubs.”

“The hubs will still continue to copy-edit the rest of the content and you will see a new status of ‘Headline Req’.”

At the time, the National Union of Journalists said the proposals amounted to an admission that subbing hubs had “failed”.

23 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • January 12, 2016 at 10:42 am
    Permalink

    Excellent. I am staying rooted in my chair for Newsquest’s response to HTFP’s request for a comment, which I guess will materialise some time before lunch (today, January 12, 2016).

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(5)
  • January 12, 2016 at 10:45 am
    Permalink

    Does ANYBODY know what they are doing there?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(12)
  • January 12, 2016 at 11:23 am
    Permalink

    @Er,
    None of the suits, that’s for sure. They haven’t done for years, which is why the company is in such a mess.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(5)
  • January 12, 2016 at 11:27 am
    Permalink

    In an already shallow pool of candidates, the Newsquest top execs seem to be leading the way in scrambling to the bottom of the pile when it comes to UK regional media senior managements.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(7)
  • January 12, 2016 at 11:46 am
    Permalink

    If Newsquest was a football referee, the crowd would be constantly chanting, “you don’t know what you’re doing, you don’t know what you’re doing, you don’t know what you’re doing…”

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(18)
  • January 12, 2016 at 11:49 am
    Permalink

    Jeez!
    Those of you at the top of Newsquest who came up with this knee-jerk decision and then almost as quickly reversed it, you haven’t got a clue have you?
    Have you?
    No. You don’t.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(12)
  • January 12, 2016 at 11:51 am
    Permalink

    The Lords of Overrule have obviously finally returned from their festive break.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(9)
  • January 12, 2016 at 12:00 pm
    Permalink

    Does http ever ask Newsquest why they never comment on these stories? I dare say we would get the same arrogant silence, but has the question ever been asked?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(7)
  • January 12, 2016 at 12:14 pm
    Permalink

    Newsquest sounds as though it is a rudderless ship.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(11)
  • January 12, 2016 at 1:35 pm
    Permalink

    Can anyone provide a paper bag for the Newsquest high-ups to try and find their way out of? Should make for an hour or more’s entertainment….

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(13)
  • January 12, 2016 at 1:51 pm
    Permalink

    I suppose Newsquest could actually train the graduate copy editors it’s hired to replace experienced and talented subs to actually do their jobs properly. No, wait…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(8)
  • January 12, 2016 at 2:51 pm
    Permalink

    My guess is that they suddenly realised that a wholesale change in people’s job descriptions/responsibilities at the hub, without proper consultation, was an employment tribunal waiting to happen.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(8)
  • January 12, 2016 at 2:53 pm
    Permalink

    Wazza Snapper is right. And they’d also be singing ‘we’re getting sacked in the morning.’ Shocking state of affairs for a once-proud industry.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(7)
  • January 12, 2016 at 3:04 pm
    Permalink

    But indecision being final does not mean that subbing hubs work.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • January 12, 2016 at 5:00 pm
    Permalink

    I can date the decline of a formerly great Newsquest evening paper I once worked for from the date Newsquest took it over. I won’t name it in fairness to the poor over-worked devils trying desperately to keep it afloat. Has the standard of newspaper management everywhere ever been lower in big companies? It’s always been far from perfect (too many over-promoted non-talents) but this is the pits.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(13)
  • January 12, 2016 at 5:03 pm
    Permalink

    I have had a U-turn. I congratulate Newsquest on having a change of heart. Yes, I am confused.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(4)
  • January 12, 2016 at 5:20 pm
    Permalink

    I despair of today’s newspaper management re editorial matters. Bring back the days when a proper editor was in charge of the newsrooms. Oh sorry – forgot that newsrooms don’t really exist in the way they were when I started 50 years ago.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(8)
  • January 12, 2016 at 9:10 pm
    Permalink

    Riffing on a late great David Bowie song Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes, Newsquest management is a sh-sh-sh-sh-shambles

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(7)
  • January 14, 2016 at 8:46 am
    Permalink

    to me, to you
    lets be honest we cant have it both ways,moans and groans ( rightly) when this ridiculous idea was announced and now its been reversed theres still moaning, yes it would be nice if someone actually knew what they were doing at NQ and thought things through first but now theyve seen the folly of this idea at least theyve held their hands up and conceded
    ” a victory for common sense” as the old cliche goes

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(4)