AddThis SmartLayers

Horizontal Jobs Scroller

Latest Jobs Call 01332 895994 to advertise here

Tories pledge to repeal Section 40 if they win General Election

ToryTheresa May has vowed to repeal controversial plans to make newspapers pay both sides’ costs in libel actions if the Tories win the General Election.

The Conservative Party’s manifesto published today says it will repeal the infamous Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act, originally designed to force publishers to sign-up to a ‘recognised’ system of press regulation.

The legislation would have seen media organisations having to pay the legal costs of both sides in libel and privacy cases, regardless of whether they win, unless they signed up to an approved press regulator under the government’s Royal Charter.

At present, the Max Mosley-funded body Impress is the only such organisation to have gained approved regulator status.  The Independent Press Standards Organisation, which most national and regional publishers are signed up to, has refused to seek approved status on the grounds that it would amount to state regulation of the press.

Culture secretary Karen Bradley had already announced a consultation into whether to go ahead with the implementation of Section 40, and with polls showing the Tories on course for a comfortable victory the controversial clause now appears dead in the water.

In today’s manifesto the Tories also pledge to scrap part two of the Leveson Inquiry, which would have looked into the corporate governance issues which gave rise to the phone hacking scandal.

The manifesto states: “At a time when the internet is changing the way people obtain their news, we need to take steps to protect the reliability and objectivity of information that is essential to our democracy and a free and independent press.

“We will ensure content creators are appropriately rewarded for the content they make available online. We will be consistent in our approach to regulation of online and offline media.

“Given the comprehensive nature of the first stage of the Leveson Inquiry and given the lengthy investigations by the police and Crown Prosecution Service into alleged wrongdoing, we will not proceed with the second stage of the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press.

“We will repeal Section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2014, which, if enacted, would force media organisations to become members of a flawed regulatory system or risk having to pay the legal costs of both sides in libel and privacy cases, even if they win.”

The move was warmly welcomed by the Society of Editors which has spearheaded the campaign against Section 40.

A spokesman said: “The role of a free press that is vociferous and investigative in holding power to account is something even its fiercest critics claim is vital in a democratic society and yet too many politicians have been steadfast in lending support to a piece of legislation which, if proposed in any other country, would have our democratic instincts up in arms.

“While the Society does not support any one political point of view, it is regrettable to see that other parties are fighting the election on manifestos which fail to deliver commitments to safeguarding freedom of expression.

“As many editors made clear publicly through their papers during the consultation process, Section 40 costs orders would have a seriously chilling effect on their work and, to put it simply, they would be less inclined to pursue investigations in the public interest when the risk of crippling legal costs would be increased.

“There has been an arduous 300-year battle to achieve press freedom and freedom of expression in the UK and we welcome the Conservative party’s recognition that Section 40 would be a giant step backwards.

“In a year in which the threat of such illogical legislation has seen the UK fall once again in the World Press Freedom Index, the repeal of Section 40 would ensure that other countries continue to look to the UK as a nation that upholds and protects the values it seeks to promote abroad.”

However campaign group Hacked Off denounced the move as “a wholesale betrayal both of victims of press abuse and ordinary members of the public.”

A spokesman said: “If this pledge is carried through, there will be no effective, independent regulation of the press in this country and no access to affordable justice for victims of press abuse. We wish to make it clear that those who have suffered at the hands of powerful and unaccountable newspapers will not tolerate this betrayal.

“It appears that the Prime Minister has stitched up a calculated deal to trade the interests of the public for favourable election coverage in powerful newspapers.

“We will fight throughout the next Parliament to ensure that the voices of ordinary people are heard above the megaphones of self-interested newspaper editors and proprietors. We will fight to ensure that the careful regulatory framework proposed by Leveson and agreed by Parliament is not systematically dismantled by a government subservient to newspaper editors.”

5 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • May 18, 2017 at 3:41 pm
    Permalink

    Just rejoice! Cry “Havoc!” and let slip the the Dustbin Of History.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(6)
  • May 18, 2017 at 3:43 pm
    Permalink

    Er, subs…when you’ve a moment, just delete one of those definite articles, if you wouldn’t mind. Er…where have the subs gone?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(8)
  • May 19, 2017 at 12:42 pm
    Permalink

    At last the tide is turning. Welcome signs that the witch-hunt against journalists may be drawing to a close.
    Section 40 “would force media organisations to become members of a flawed regulatory system” This is exactly what many organisations, including the Chartered Institute of Journalists, to which I belong, have been saying for ages.
    Let’s hope the manifesto pledge is upheld – we’ll be holding them to account if not.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(3)
  • May 22, 2017 at 10:07 am
    Permalink

    Amanda Brodie: The PM pledging to repeal it means she won’t repeal it. Duh…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • May 22, 2017 at 1:25 pm
    Permalink

    Why is nobody shouting BRIBERY at the very top of their lungs?!

    If you’re a journalist and you vote Tory for this reason, you should feel utterly ashamed of yourself. Our national press is already behaving in an utterly despicable way regarding this election (and Brexit) and including this in the Tory manifesto is disgusting and is obviously aimed at gullible journos who think it’ll actually happen.

    Shameful.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(6)

House rules Add a comment

You now need to be logged-in to our site in order to comment on stories. Please login or register using the buttons below or login via Facebook or Twitter.

Register

Advanced search

View Jobs by Category

Job Alerts