AddThis SmartLayers

Horizontal Jobs Scroller

Latest Jobs Call 01332 895994 to advertise here

Dyson at Large: Why was Cregan plea change on Page 5?

After three or four attempts, I gave up trying to pronounce the Tameside Reporter’s tongue-twisting splash headline on Thursday 14 February.

Have a go yourself: ‘Into Metropo-bliss!’ Now repeat five times, without stopping; meaningless, isn’t it?

What I was sure about, however, was that this should not have been the splash, and that no amount of clever wordsmithing could persuade me otherwise.

And as with all failing headlines, the exclamation mark only served to underline the fact that it didn’t work; but more on exclamation marks later.

First, let’s consider what I think should have been the front page lead: ‘Cregan in dramatic guilty plea change’.

This was the much better headline on page five, where a detailed, 53-paragraph court report told the breaking story – it happened on the Tuesday – of cop-killer Dale Cregan, who had suddenly admitted the murders of PCs Fiona Bone and Nicola Hughes.

Yes, it was such a huge tale that the news would immediately have been online that day and in the nationals the next, so its placement in a local weekly is worthy of debate.

But to me, this was the tale that would have gripped all Reporter readers, the fatal gun and grenade attack having taken place in Mottram, Longdendale – in the heart of the paper’s patch in Tameside, Greater Manchester.

The Reporter had sent its own staffer – Max Wieland – to file from Preston Crown Court and he’d left nothing out of his story, one that could have been cleverly written off as a must-read splash, perhaps with ‘I did murder PCs Fiona and Nicola’ as an even better headline.

As for the new Metrolink line to Droylsden, that could still have been the second lead, a picture or a write-off nib, but it struggled as a picture splash, and I disliked the exclamation marks in the headline and picture caption – ‘IT’S HERE!’

This unfortunate dependency on exclamation marks was displayed throughout the Tameside Reporter, including:

  • ‘Pan-tastic day!’ in the page three headline, with the first par reading: ‘Ashton’s Ladysmith Shopping Centre team scooped this year’s ‘Pancake flipping’ competition in a contest that saw the reigning champions lose in style!’
  • The second par of the page six lead reporting on love matches at a local factory: ‘The workers are always in love and most of them with each other!’
  • The first par of the page 11 lead: ‘It was a very full weekend for Tameside’s libraries as they celebrated National Libraries Day and the Chinese New Year!’
  • The first par of the page 14 lead: ‘A local business has won a top north west award – just four months after starting up!’
  • The first word of the page 16 lead: ‘Finally!’
  • The headline on page 27: ‘Mayor drops in!’

I could go on, but my point has been made: exclamation marks in headlines and content rarely add anything, apart from stilting the flow for readers.

As one former editor used to boom across the newsroom in my youth: “No dogs’ cocks allowed in my paper!” (I know, crude, but that’s what exclamation marks were called at the Birmingham Post and Mail in the early 1990s.)

One more need for improvement on the Reporter was the layout inside, which too often meant headlines on opposite pages running into each other like this one: ‘Faster than lightening MP demands…’.

But I don’t want to be too harsh: splash choices, grammar style and page design can be improved, and it’s relatively early days since the Tameside Reporter – Sir Harold Evans’ first paper in the 1940s – was rescued and relaunched last autumn.

The encouraging thing about the paper was plenty of decent stories: a murder search with a CCTV image on page two, a hospital scandal on page four and greenbelt planning anger on page seven, to name just a few, on top of the Cregan trial latest.

We need to encourage the survival of independent local papers like the Reporter, and so I hope the above critique helps the editorial team to strengthen the shape and projection of what was ultimately a good read.


You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • March 20, 2013 at 8:57 am

    The running-on headline is pretty grim. Grimmer still is the fact that “lightning” is spelled “lightening”. If you read the text, the band’s name is even spelled “lightning” several times. Subbing cutbacks?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • March 20, 2013 at 9:40 am

    Hey Steve – that “don’t want to be too harsh” line was an awfully long time coming!!!!

    Sorry – couldn’t resist.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • March 20, 2013 at 10:43 am

    @Slang King. You can also see subbing issues in the story below where the last letter of ‘heroes’ runs into a boxed picture.

    Our house style would be to never use ‘It’s’ instead of it is, in a headline or body text but that may not be the case at the reporter.

    One last point, not just directed at the reporter, but I really do not like lower case for the names of papers. It just does not look correct or professional

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • March 20, 2013 at 2:48 pm

    Oh dear… shame to see the once loved Ripsnorter in this state.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • March 21, 2013 at 9:47 am

    Agree with all of Steve’s points. Bad choice of splash capped off with awkward headline and uninteresting picture, exclamation should be barred from 99.99% of copy and the subbing/proof-reading is poor. That said, they probably have about two members of staff so shouldn’t be too harsh.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • March 26, 2013 at 12:48 pm

    If only Steve had applied such incisive analysis to the Birmingham Mail a decade ago – remember it, the relaunch he came up with and which lost 25% of circulation in a heart beat? Go tell it to the Marines mate

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • March 26, 2013 at 5:41 pm

    Ah, still griping then ‘Forpetessake’ (or should that be ‘LOL’ or ‘Bagless Vacuum’?)

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)

Advanced search

View Jobs by Category

Job Alerts