AddThis SmartLayers

‘We’ll make you think ‘ says regional daily ahead of EU vote

A regional daily has declared its intention to make its readers think ahead of European Union referendum next month.

While vowing to remain neutral on the 23 June vote, the Yorkshire Post has launched a campaign for a “more mature” debate on the issue.

In an editorial published yesterday to mark 30 days until the vote, the paper accused politicians of spreading “alarmist scare stories” and reducing the debate to a “battle of egos.”

A Tweet on the Post’s official Twitter account declared:“We won’t tell you what to think. We’ll make you think.”


The editorial reads: “So much for the European Union referendum being a great exercise in democratic renewal which not only settles Britain’s relationship with the EU for a generation but also rekindles the electorate’s interest in public affairs.

“With 30 days to go, the daily mudslinging is not only bringing the conduct of politics into disrepute but threatens to alienate those voters who are taking their duties seriously ahead of June 23 and are trying to come to a considered decision.

“If all they’re going to get are the alarmist scare stories being propagated by the increasingly frenetic – some might argue desperate – Remain and Leave campaigns, they can’t be blamed if they choose not to engage in political debate in the future or, in some cases, decide not to stand for public office.”

“This should be an opportunity for both sides set out the advantages of disadvantages of their respective arguments before allowing voters to consider what is best for their needs and also future generations, namely those who are too young to vote next month.

The piece added that rather than addressing the specific concerns of women or young families, the campaign is “degenerating into a battle of egos” exemplified by the internal conflict within the Conservative Party between David Cameron and Boris Johnson “after these two Old Etonian contemporaries fell out spectacularly”.

The editorial continues: “Irrespective of the referendum’s outcome, the conduct of both will only make it harder for the Government to come together after polling day and concentrate on building a more prosperous economy for all.

“As such, it won’t be Britain which is the biggest loser of all if the negative campaigning degenerates still further over the next 30 days. It will be the whole democratic process – and the country’s political elite will only have itself to blame.”

The Post’s policy of neutrality mirrors that of Wolverhampton daily the Express & Star, which declared the position despite a poll in the newspaper revealing four out of five of readers would vote for Brexit on 23 June.


You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • May 26, 2016 at 9:24 am

    How patronising. Make you think? What? They think their readers don’t think?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(3)
  • May 26, 2016 at 10:08 am

    It’s not patronising at all. The readers DO think, but both sides – particularly the Leave camp – are just promoting scare stories, bogus facts, distortions and even outright lies. Now that IS patronising. “Making you think” is not patronising, it is (I hope) a promise to present the arguments so that readers can use the intelligence the paper gives them credit for – a\nd which the current reporting doesn’t.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • May 26, 2016 at 11:45 am

    Hacker – surely it is on the lines of you (or us) seeing, hearing or reading something and saying… ‘and that really made me think’ ?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(1)
  • May 26, 2016 at 12:10 pm

    Why is the YP so insufferably pompous?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(3)
  • May 27, 2016 at 12:23 am

    The piece added that rather than addressing the specific concerns of women or young families, the campaign is “degenerating into a battle of egos”.

    Unless I’m reading this wrong but why would the “specific concerns” of women or young families be any more important than those of anyone else?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)