AddThis SmartLayers

Watchdog dismisses fraudster’s claims about ‘loud and aggressive’ reporter

andrew-whiteA convicted fraudster who claimed a reporter was “loud and aggressive” to him has had his complaint rejected by the press watchdog.

Andrew White, left, also expressed concern that the Loughborough Echo journalist had not made clear he was with a photographer, who had taken his picture without his knowledge or consent.

White had pleaded guilty to fraud by misrepresentation after inventing a story about a nine-year-old girl with terminal cancer, and appealing to local people and businesses to donate money in order to pay for her to go on a dream holiday.

He complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that the Echo breached Clause 1 (Accuracy), Clause 2 (Privacy) and Clause 3 (Harassment) of the Editors’ Code of Practice in a report of the case.

The Echo had become suspicious about White’s fundraising when it found that a picture, which he claimed to be of the child and her family, had been taken by a photography company around six years previously.

White said was approached outside his workplace by the reporter, who had spoken in a loud and aggressive voice, which was so quick and intimidating that he had not thought to ask him to go away.

He said that as he got into his car, the reporter had shouted aggressively “what happened to all the money you stole from everybody,” although he claimed no money had actually been handed over.

White said he would have spoken to the reporter had his behaviour not been so intimidating, so he had not “declined to speak” as suggested in the article.

In response, the Echo said the reporter and the photographer who had accompanied him did not consider that he had raised his voice or spoken aggressively.

The journalist had asked a couple of questions but the complainant had remained silent before getting into his car.

The complaint was not upheld, and the full adjudication can be read here.

4 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • December 6, 2016 at 10:06 am
    Permalink

    It beggars belief that our legal system has become so corrupted as to allow the cost of a challenge like this from a person like this.
    Proper investigative journalism to uncover issues of interest to the wider public has almost died a death, especially in the regional press.
    Sometimes, when you are trying to get answers to someone who doesn’t – for whatever reason – want to talk, you have to raise your voice. If they are getting into a car, for example.
    Where is the common sense approach here? And presumably a lawyer thought it would be a wise case to bring.
    I’m astounded.
    And more saddened than usual.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(16)
  • December 6, 2016 at 11:33 am
    Permalink

    I hope the Echo ran the adjudication prominently, with picture.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(7)
  • December 6, 2016 at 12:53 pm
    Permalink

    I thought I had seen everything after a recent case where a woman asserted that a single phone call from a journalist constituted harassment – but this really takes the biscuit…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(6)
  • December 7, 2016 at 9:31 am
    Permalink

    How did this ludicrous claim even reach IPSO — they must be short of issues to justify their existence. And who, may I ask, pays for all of this?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(4)