Former Treasury chief Lord Burns had admitted it will “take time” to read the thousands of submissions, many of which were encouraged as part of the #HandsOffFoI campaign launched by the Society of Editors and backed by HTFP and Press Gazette.
Now the SoE is requesting the chance to give oral evidence to the review, after Lord Burns announced that it will be staging two oral hearings in January.
Lord Burns said: “I’m pleased to have received approximately 30,000 submissions of evidence from individuals, campaign groups, journalists and civil society organisations from all over the country.
“Given the large volume of evidence that we have received, it will take time to read and consider all of the submissions.”
“Furthermore, the Commission has also decided to invite some parties to provide oral evidence.
“This will take place in two sessions on the 20 and 25 January 2016. Our intention is to report as soon as possible after these sessions.”
SoE executive director Bob Satchwell said: “Hopefully after 30,000 submissions they have dropped the ill-advised idea of charging for requests and trying to make it more difficult to make one.
“What we need is an extension not a contraction of the Freedom of Information Act.”
The Commission, made up largely of opponents and sceptics of FoI, is thought to want to water-down the current legislation by introducing charges for requests and more exemptions.