AddThis SmartLayers

Daily’s dual splash reflects Thatcher divide

Margaret Thatcher’s controversial legacy has been commemorated in a unique double-front page edition of a regional daily.

Following the Iron Lady’s funeral yesterday, the Northern Echo made the decision to print two alternative splashes – one featuring the messages of tribute and the other focusing on the devastation she caused mining communities in the region.

A letter was sent out to newsagents explaining the concept, and leaving it up to them to decide which one to display.

Editor Peter Barron said the editorial team had decided it was the best way to reflect the huge divide in opinion in the North-East about the former Prime Minister’s record.

The Northern Echo's alternative front pages

Peter told HTFP:  “All the way through we have seen a great polarisation of opinion – many people still feel very strongly about her impact on the region.

“We had to reflect that but I didn’t want it to feel disrespectful. We started talking about the two sides of the story and then my deputy, Chris Lloyd, suggested two front pages. It went from there.”

The ‘normal’ front page features an image of Thatcher’s coffin being carried through the streets, with tributes from MPs, while what is normally the back page is taken up by the alternative splash, featuring critical commentary from mining communities.

Each ‘front’ also features a ragout of the alternative and a cross-reference to it.

Peter said the headline – “We’ll always remember her” – was deliberately chosen as it works in both contexts.

He said most of the feedback had been “overwhelmingly  positive.” “The reaction has been huge – it has been mad on Twitter,” he said.

“Most people have said they like it. There have been a few people who think we should have chosen one or the other. But I think it reflects our editorial stance, which from the beginning has been that it is wrong to celebrate someone’s death, even if you feel strongly that she did destroy your community.”

Among those who questioned the idea were former Bradford Telegraph & Argus editor Mike Glover, who Tweeted: “Brilliant innovation or ultimate cop-out? Discuss.”

Peter said he hopes the unusual edition will boost sales, as the North-East has not seen the same boost to newspaper circulation that has been reported in the rest of the country.

“We didn’t see that jump in sales, maybe because people feel differently up here,” he said.

“By giving newsagents the choice of which one to display, we are hoping to give a balanced view and perhaps more people might pick up a copy.

“I think what we will see is newsagents in ‘pit’ communities will display the paper back-side up, while more sympathetic areas will get the coffin image on the front.

“It’s the first time I have done something like this, and I have certainly never seen it done anywhere else either.”

And the choice was welcomed by newspaper vendors in the area.

Barry Clish, owner of Clish’s Newsagents, in Easington Lane, near Easington, chose the miner’s front page to display, saying many of his customers had refused to buy their usual paper if it had a picture of Mrs Thatcher’s coffin on the front.

“It’s a amazing how much hatred there still is for her in this area,” he added.

Maureen Heron, manager of Finlays newsagents in Yoden Way, Peterlee, also displayed the paper with the miners’ banner as the front page when she realised there was a choice.

“Everybody pokes her in the eye when they bring the paper to the counter – they dislike her that much,” she said.

However, in Thirsk, North Yorkshire, which is traditionally a Tory stronghold, Martin Rench, from Towlers newsagents, was happy to display the front page featuring the former Prime Minister’s coffin.

19 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • April 18, 2013 at 12:18 pm
    Permalink

    Since when did we delegate editorial decisions to newsagents?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 12:50 pm
    Permalink

    Should have put both on display for sale equally and let readers decide. Afterall, readers are the ones that really matter.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 1:19 pm
    Permalink

    So the Editor, who gets paid to make decisions, couldn’t make a decision? Perhaps the best idea would have been to splash on a local story?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 1:39 pm
    Permalink

    It would have been nice if Peter Barron had actually done some homework … under Thatcher, 15 Durham pits closed … under Wilson, 58. Overall, it was 160 closed under Thatcher and 290 under Wilson. The inconvenience of the truth.

    Papers should just report the news and let people make their own mind up, especially when they take sides then don’t even give it a proper context.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 1:46 pm
    Permalink

    It would have been nice if Simon above had some homework. As always the devil is in the detail.

    The pits Wilson closed were relatively small and in terms of affecting our capacity to produce coal had little effect.

    Thatcher decimated our coal producing capacity. Yes she closed fewer pits but they were huge pits employing hundreds

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 2:04 pm
    Permalink

    Hi Simon, I did not know those pit closure facts regarding Thatcher and Wilson. Were did you get the information?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 2:06 pm
    Permalink

    Sorry, I meant to write ‘where did you get the information!’

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 2:37 pm
    Permalink

    I think the facts over who closed the most pits is slightly irrelevant in this case.

    The local feeling (it’s a local paper) was in anger to Thatcher. Perhaps the Echo should have gone up there and pointed out the figures to them…..

    ….. Pull your head out. The locals hated thatcher and celebrated her death. The fact Wilson closed more has nothing to do with the LOCAL reaction to her death.

    The Echo couldn’t say “Sorry we are not covering the death party as they haven’t got their facts right”

    Do some of you actually work in journalism? And no I do not work for the Echo or even the same company.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 4:25 pm
    Permalink

    Wouldn’t it have been better to do just one front, keeping the same head (or something like ‘Maggie: The great divide’) and then splitting the page half and half, pro and con, with a bit of careful cropping of images still retaining impact?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 4:26 pm
    Permalink

    House rules (or mr tubbs): ‘The fact Wilson closed more has nothing to do with the LOCAL reaction to her death.’ But look at the web link and see the local pits closed down before Thatcher. Surely it’s about getting a rounded story?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 4:38 pm
    Permalink

    Not a cop out at all. What is often forgotten is that there are dozens of thousands of Tory voters in the circulation area of The Northern Echo, even though the area returns mainly Labour MPs.

    Darlington, the paper’s home town, was a marginal constituency not so long ago and it’s not difficult to find even those with centre-left views who acknowledge that Thatcher’s premiership wasn’t all bad (and that Arthur Scargill is as much to blame for the demise of the coal industry.)

    The idea that people in the region would vote for a monkey if it wore a red rosette simply isn’t true.

    Peter Barron has a more nuanced view of his readership, as you’d expect, than the commentators using phrases such as ‘cop out;.

    Being from the North East I know that the reaction to Margaret Thatcher’s death is not so clear cut as people might prefer to think. Even many Labour voters who disliked her policies think the ‘death parties’ were grotesque.

    The Echo’s own website carried a majority of comments criticising the Durham Miners organisation for having a ‘death party’.

    I like the alternative front pages. I think the Echo has been highly creative in covering the story.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 4:50 pm
    Permalink

    Gawd, there’s some moaners out there.
    I know the Northern Echo’s distribution area and it covers old pit communities and some very affluent spots in North Yorkshire where Maggie would be worshipped.
    This is a brilliant commercial decision and the ultimate in “reader participation”, which is what we’re about these days.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 4:55 pm
    Permalink

    Today’s Hartlepool Mail neatly captured both views on a single front page and added the extra angle of a local hero soldier acting as a pallbearer at the funeral. That’s the way to do it, Mr Barron.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 18, 2013 at 5:27 pm
    Permalink

    So The Northern Echo splashes on a story about something that happened in London.

    Am I missing something here?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(1)
  • April 19, 2013 at 12:13 pm
    Permalink

    It’s a local, national and international story. To NOT cover such a global event would be highly strange!

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • April 25, 2013 at 11:17 am
    Permalink

    What happened to the barcode on one of the pages?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)