AddThis SmartLayers

Leveson ‘could erode’ links between press and police

A journalism tutor has raised fears that the relationship between the police and the regional press could be eroded in the wake of the Leveson Inquiry.

Andrew Kelly, head of the London foundation course at Press Association Training, said it was essential that journalists continued to have access to police officers on the ground.

He said the “paranoid situation” created by the Leveson Inquiry into press standards could undermine the trust between the police and the regional press.

In his report, Lord Justice Leveson raised concerns about the relationship between the police and the press, including tip-offs, off-the-record briefings and “excessive proximity”.

Andrew made his comments after one of his students, Amelia Latham Wake, who is on PA’s Foundation Course in Multimedia Journalism, went on a dawn drugs raid with police in Hounslow.

He said such stories must continue despite the growing ranks of press officers and attempts to legislate against journalists.

Said Andrew: “I don’t think we’ve lost that essential relationship…yet. Reporters are still rubbing shoulders with police officers on the ground, sitting in vans at dawn waiting to carry out a raid as Amelia’s feature demonstrates so well.

“That relationship continues across the UK, in cities and towns throughout the country on a daily basis. It is an essential part of the democratic process.

“The public pay taxes that fund police officers who act on their behalf and in their name. The press report on these activities and inform the public of what is being carried out at their behest.

“This is a critical relationship that cannot and should not be eroded or negated by any parliamentary or judicial process.

“Reporters must act in the interests of the wider public and they need direct contact with authorities, particularly the police in order to do that. In order to question. In order to enjoy a relationship. In order to establish trust.

“The paranoid situation created by Leveson undermines this covenant of trust and damages the function of the regional press to inform its readers.”

In Amelia’s feature, which was published in the Hounslow Chronicle, she wrote about her 4am alarm call ahead of the police’s crackdown day on drug crime and how she was warmly welcomed by the police inspector leading the operation.

She wrote: “As a journalist, you are taught to look for the dirt, the chink in the armour, the string with which to unravel the story, but I couldn’t help but be utterly impressed by what I saw, from early morning briefing throughout a day of 33 warrants and a subsequent 20 arrests, there was a slickness and unshakeable structure in their work that was unquestionable.”

2 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • May 7, 2013 at 9:46 am
    Permalink

    Leveson is probably already having an effect on police/press relationships. Or perhaps it’s something more fundamental?

    I’m trying not to hark back to a golden age that didn’t exist, but in the 1970s reporters would either visit West Mercia’s Evesham police station for a morning chat with the chief inspector, or phone him. He knew and trusted us and we knew and trusted him. If he couldn’t reveal details of something publicly, he would tell us anyway and explain why. We would honour that trust.

    Evesham police station is now just a satellite of Worcester, 17 miles away. Pershore police station was sold off years ago. The Evesham Journal has moved its base to Worcester, does it even have its own editor now?

    As far as North Yorkshire Police is concerned, the Jimmy Tarbuck issue was just waiting to happen.

    The highly respected and popular Chief Insp Ron Johnson retired as force press officer several years ago. Ron was ace in earning and giving trust to the media, over decades. Police press officers, helpful though they will always try to be, are nothing like the day-to-day contact with someone like Ron Johnson or the Evesham chief inspector.

    So there are two problems here. One is Leveson, the police don’t want to be accused of naming names of arrested famous people, although they seem OK about doing it to ordinary folk. The second is that there is little contact and therefore little trust between individual reporters and senior police officers because so many police stations have closed and newspapers have consolidated their businesses in towns away from the area they serve.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)