A trainee reporter from a weekly newspaper took on five barristers to successfully challenge a Section 11 order to withhold the addresses of defendants in a murder trial.

Ilford Recorder journalist Amanda Nunn, left, argued her case against the barristers at magistrates court, assisted by text messages from news editor Zjan Shirinian and fellow trainee Lizzie Dearden.

One barrister argued that the order was needed to protect the mother and sister of a defendant from retribution, adding that it was “just an address” and he didn’t see how it was in the public interest, with the other four barristers using a similar argument.

But Amanda, who joined the Archant London title in March, argued that Section 11 orders made under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 can only normally be used in cases of blackmail or national security.

She and the barristers were sent out of court for around 30 minutes while the magistrates deliberated before deciding to refuse the barristers’ applications.

Amanda said: “I argued that a Section 11 was usually used in cases of blackmail and national security, neither of which was relevant here.

“Also, it can be used to protect witnesses involved in a case if it is in the interests of justice. As their families were not witnesses this was not relevant either. It is not the street name itself that is important but the notion of open justice.”

“While it’s tempting to be blasé about taking on five barristers and their solicitors with three alleged murderers in the dock all looking at you, it was intimidating and knowing that Zjan and Lizzie had my back meant a hell of a lot to me that morning.”

Editor Chris Carter added: “It’s a fine example of well trained, professional journalists upholding the freedom of the press in reporting court cases.

“I am particularly delighted at the way my team pulled together to support Amanda, in order that we achieved the correct result.”