AddThis SmartLayers

Daily print publishing will remain our focus – E&S boss

A senior editorial executive on Britain’s biggest-selling regional daily has reaffirmed its commitment to daily print publishing.

In a live Q&A with readers to mark Local Newspaper Week, Express & Star executive editor Mark Drew put the paper’s success down to providing ‘the latest news, printed on the day.’

He said readers still ‘like the feel’ of a newspaper in their hands, and that he did not expect this to change in the next decade.

In a wide-ranging discussion via the CoverItLive platform, Mark also warned that the Leveson Inquiry could “stifle the spirit of local newspaper reporting.’

During the two-hour S&A Mark was asked about the impact of the internet and how the paper would look in ten years time.

He responded: “The internet is becoming a big part of our operation now. But the main focus of our operation each day is the printed newspaper and I think that will be the same 10 years from now.

“We remain the only local newspaper in the country to sell more than 100,000 copies of the paper. Many people like to have the feel of a paper in their hands and I do not think that will change.

“The internet has opened up some great opportunities – like this webchat today – and I think we will continue to explore how we can develop the internet without taking away our main focus on the printed form of the paper.

Asked whether there were any plans to take the paper weekly, Mark responded:  “There are certainly no plans for that.

“The E&S is the most successful daily local newspaper in the country and that success is down to offering the very latest news, printed on the day.

“Some newspapers elsewhere have gone weekly because it has been decided that they can be more profitable. The Bath Chronicle, for example, has been weekly for many years after serving the city as a daily for decades. The Bristol Evening Post recently decided that it would lose its Saturday edition and is now printed five days a week.

“But it is vital for an area as big as the Black Country, Staffordshire and Worcestershire to have a daily newspaper, six days a week, and there is no reason to doubt that that will ever change.”

On Leveson, Mark said in the inquiry raised many questions about the future of newspapers and the way they are regulated.

But he added:  “The issues that are being raised, such as as phone hacking and the relationship between journalists and the police, are ones that effect national newspapers.

“Local newspapers such as the Express & Star pride themselves on their integrity. The issue of phone hacking is not one that we have ever been affected by. We have good relationships with all kinds of contacts, but they are purely on a professional basis.

“The Leveson Inquiry is likely to come up with a ‘beefed up’ way to regulate the press. The concern of local newspapers is that, while monitoring the national press, it will be too stringent and could stifle the spirit of local newspaper reporting.”

The full Q&A can be read at the Express & Star website here.

Deputy editor Mark Acheson said: ‘It was a great success and really worthwhile. The team here got into the spirit and helped paint a great picture of a day in the life of The News.”

6 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • May 22, 2012 at 3:55 pm
    Permalink

    Folk can say what they like about the E&S, but to me the above again shows that its strategy should be listened to and at least considered along with the ‘follow my plc leader’ direction of most groups. This wouldn’t matter if the E&S was a tiny daily in a little backwater with terrible sales. But it’s not – it’s the biggest, and its performance should not just be ignored.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • May 22, 2012 at 5:24 pm
    Permalink

    Isn’t it interesting how almost every conversation among journos about the E&S starts with the words: “Folk can say what they like about the E&S, but…..”?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • May 23, 2012 at 10:59 am
    Permalink

    Steve says that the performance of the E&S should not be ignored. He’s right – so let’s check the figures.

    According to the Jul-Dec 2011 ABCs, circulation of the E&S was down 10.9% on the same period in the previous year. The headline figure includes around 5000 free copies so it’s worth also checking the number of copies sold at cover price – down 11.6% year-on-year. And the trend is worsening… In the two previous ABC periods, sales were down 2.8% then 5.2%.

    I don’t write this to decry the E&S or the strategy adopted by the publishers, but I hope it kills the notion that same-day printing is some panacea to circulation woes.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • May 23, 2012 at 4:17 pm
    Permalink

    True, Ill-informed, true. My point, though, is that this works two-ways. Papers that have gone overnight do not have climbing sales, do they? In fact, most have suffered deeper declines, for longer. ‘Live’ newspapers are not the only issue, of course. But it is (and for many, was) part of the content package. That’s not the case any more (apart from a few, like the E&S).

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • May 23, 2012 at 6:53 pm
    Permalink

    The Shropshire Star also had a web chat with it’s Editor today. Why does it seem as if the Star, which is being stripped to the bone to save the E&S (not that it’s working), is being ignored?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • May 24, 2012 at 10:41 am
    Permalink

    You’re right, Steve, regional dailies that have gone overnight do not have climbing sales but they’re typically doing better than -10.9%. In the league table of ABC performances, the E&S is in danger of relegation rather than fighting for honours. Whilst it’s top of the pile in terms of actual sales, that’s surely more to do with the size of the catchment area than being a ‘live’ newspaper.

    Also, in my experience, titles that have gone overnight have enjoyed a 12-month benefit. The sales trends almost invariably improved by three to four percentage points (e.g. titles tracking at -8% moved to -4%) because it was on sale earlier.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)