AddThis SmartLayers

Editors ‘could be prosecuted’ for publishing sex ads

Newspapers which publish sex adverts could face prosecution by the Metropolitan Police, it was claimed today.

As part of an exclusive investigation into sex trafficking, the Croydon Guardian reports a senior police officer saying editors who continue to run adverts for brothels could be arrested.

Vice squad detective inspector Kevin Hyland told the paper: “It is an offence to advertise for prostitution. If newspapers do run adverts there is a possibility of prosecution.

“The legislation we are thinking of using is aiding and abetting offences of controlling prostitution for gain, offences of trafficking under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and possibly money laundering.”


Matthew Knowles, assistant editor at the Croydon Guardian, said chief reporter Kirsty Whalley had spent the last eight months working on the story.

He said: “Kirsty was contacted by a woman who had been beaten, raped and tortured after getting trafficked across to the UK on the false promise of a job.

“She had read earlier stories Kirsty had written about sex trafficking in Croydon and wanted contact details of someone who could help. Kirsty befriended the woman and over a series of emails gained her trust.

“DI Kevin Hyland of the Met’s vice unit took up the woman’s case and Kirsty followed this up with a series of meetings about his initiatives to tackle sex trafficking, as he was thrilled about the position our newspaper group had taken over the sex ads issue.

“Kirsty worked closely with DI Hyland to prepare this week’s story which has involved long and sometimes fraught negotiations to get to this stage.”

In the Guardian’s article, it claims sex adverts were estimated to be worth more than £44m for the regional press in 2006.

A spokeswoman for the Metropolitan Police Service said its Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command was a specialist unit tackling trafficking and prostitution and a number of people had been jailed in recent months.

She said: “In many of these investigations, the organised criminal networks have sought to advertise through local newspapers or advertising journals.

“It is important that everyone plays their part in trying to reduce the opportunity of criminal networks to continue their illegal activities and their exploitation of vulnerable people through advertising sexual services. The MPS is working with the media to tackle this.”

The weekly newspaper is owned by Newsquest which took a decision in 2008 to ban sex adverts but rival Northcliffe title the Croydon Advertiser has been criticised for continuing to run the adverts.

In August the Advertiser faced calls by Croydon Community Against Trafficking for readers to boycott it in August, after it ran a story exposing a brothel, while at the same time allegedly carrying adverts for the same establishment.

Its editor-in-chief Alan Geere has yet to respond to requests for a comment on the Guardian’s report.

Former regional editor Steve Dyson, who called for a ban on sex ads this summer, said: “This is exactly why the regional newspaper industry needs to be so careful about the sexually explicit services it potentially offers via its classified sections.

“What has been seen in Croydon is surely a reminder to all in our industry that now is the time to ban sex ads.”

5 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • October 18, 2010 at 4:54 pm
    Permalink

    Has the sanctimonious Guardian series got another agenda, methinks? Perhaps by playing at taking the moral high ground they are telling the advertisers of the competition newspapers to come to them, rather that stay with the porn peddlers! Pathetic and not very subtle.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 21, 2010 at 12:20 pm
    Permalink

    Old Hack – You agree with the kidnapping, rape and torture of women then I take it? No one can justify these ads any more. The only reason the ‘sanctimonious’ Guardian series can run this story is that Newsquest pulled out of taking these ads more than two years ago costing them millions. Could you see any other newspaper group reporting this initiative? I expect you work for the competition.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • November 1, 2010 at 3:57 pm
    Permalink

    Never mind arresting editors for for carrying sex industry adverts, how about stopping journalists from inventing statistics to support their cause. Kirsty Whalley wrote that an ‘estimated 4,000 women a year are trafficked into the country’ (Croydon Guardian 20/10/10). I emailed her to ask where she got the statistic from, she replied that it was an official Home Office figure. I replied that it isn’t. I have yet to receive a reply from her. She has no credibility as a journalist with me.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • December 1, 2010 at 9:36 am
    Permalink

    Newsquest did not stop running sex ads, all they did was put them in a different place, get us to change the wording and start charging more. Being in the trade I knew who was who in these papers and knew when someone new popped up, surely it is a better way of keeping an eye on what is going on instead of driving it further underground? Being an independent prostitute is just as legal as being a plumber or a hairdresser who are freely able to advertise in such publications, it is discrimination against LEGAL sex workers.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)