follow journalism_news at http://twitter.com

Alphason TV Stands from Go Electrical

About Us Journalism books Email
 

Evening News hits back over council secrecy

The Cambridge Evening News has hit back at attempts to ban it from reporting controversial issues at council meetings by running a double page spread and front page picture highlighting the problems it has faced.

Under the headline 'Top Secret', the paper attacked South Cambs District Council for its decision to hold a series of meetings behind closed doors.

Editor Murray Morse took the decision after the authority announced it was banning the public and the media from a special cabinet meeting to discuss the eviction of travellers from an illegal camp site.

The paper has campaigned since November for the Government to introduce new laws to tackle illegal gypsy encampments, and to provide local authorities with the clout and finace to set up new legal sites for travellers to live.

South Cambs' decision to go into secret session was made despite more than £200,000 of taxpayers' money having been spent on lawyers tackling illegal traveller camps in the area in the past year.

The News was been told that if it sent a journalist to report what happened at the meeting they would be told to leave the council chamber.

The paper claims it is only the latest measures used by officials to prevent information being made public.

Recent developments include:

  • The News being barred from hearing the findings of an investigation into nearly £500,000 going missing from the council's Direct Labour Organisation.

  • Officers' reports on travellers issues and other topics - including staffing arrangements and financial strategy - being restricted from view on the council's official website.

  • An electronic voting system being introduced to replace the age old practice of councillors raising their hands in public.

  • Officers refusing to reveal details of how councillors voted when a controversial 100 per cent increase in the Council Tax precept was passed, insisting the request for this information should have been made before the debate.

    Editor Murray said: "With the introduction of the Freedom of Information Act this year politicians were supposed to become more accountable, not less.

    "We were determined to show our readers the problems that we faced and did it in an intelligent, bright and hard-hitting manner.

    "We spoke to people involved in the traveller problem and organisations such as the Campaign for Freedom of Information, as well as a number of councillors who also opposed the measures.

    "Obviously there will be a rare occasion when a discussion will have to be held in private but if there is any doubt whatsoever the meeting should be open to the public and press.

    "We will continue to highlight any attempts by local authorities to prevent us from reporting the news properly."





  • E-mail this story to a friend. Your name:

    Your friend's e-mail:


    Jobsmake the next move in your journalism career Registernews and jobs updates direct to your desktop rss feed Photographylatest news for press, agency & freelancers Dailywhat's its circulation? who's the editor? Freelance indexSee our searchable list for freelance help Weeklywant to find a weekly? use our vast database Funniesquirky stories and unusual headlines Story ideasshort of story ideas? click here! Awardswon an award? let us know As featured on News Now Campaignsnewspapers fighting for their communities Contactsforget your Filofax! go straight to the horse's mouth Glossarysearch the database to help you out Website reviewsmore than 1,600 sites reviewed to save you time