Regional titles which faced the most IPSO complaints revealed
Cases led to just two fully upheld rulings
The Press Complaints Commission was set up in 1991 to ensure that British newspapers and magazines follow the letter and spirit of the Editor’s Code of Practice which deals with ethical issues such as inaccuracy, privacy, misrepresentation and harassment. The PCC was replaced by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) in 2014.
Most complaints are resolved directly by editors to the satisfaction of those complaining. ISPO adjudicates formally on the remainder, with all critical adjudications published in full by the publications involved.
We aim to cover all IPSO adjudications on HoldtheFrontPage, and you will find them here.
Cases led to just two fully upheld rulings
Watchdog rejects dangerous dog owner’s complaint
Resident was unhappy with headline
Clarification resolves issue with jailed sex offender
“Strange noises” on phone formed part of failed case
Tory claimed piece had led to security issues
Resident’s group chair pursued complaint
Jailed dealer complained to watchdog
Family claimed story caused “immeasurable harm”
Complaint followed “off the record” interview dispute
IPSO rules newspaper acted appropriately
IPSO finds in regional daily’s favour
IPSO dismisses owner’s complaint against daily
Watchdog rules newspaper resolved complaint
Flat owner’s claim was presented as fact
Newspaper claimed singer had been due to perform ‘Sailing’