Steve Dyson's Blog
follow journalism_news at http://twitter.com



Alphason TV Stands from Go Electrical

Classic Car Insurance from Footman James

Pub Insurance from Supercover Ltd

Home Lighting from Light My Home

Wireless Headsets from Headsets4Business

Liebherr Wine Coolers from Go Electrical



rss feed
As featured on News Now
HTFP Facebook page
Email
Journalism books
 

Information 'will be free' under new Act

The Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, has told journalists that requests for information under the new Freedom of Information Act will be free of charge in the vast majority of cases.

Addressing the Society of Editors conference, he said there would be no charge for information that costs public bodies less than £450 and central government less than £600 to produce.

"No individual should be priced out of the right to know," the Lord Chancellor told delegates during a debate on the new act due to come into force next January. "So I am pleased to announce today, that for the vast majority of cases there will be no charge for information supplied under the Freedom of Information Act. Freedom of Information really means free information."

He added that the Government would reimburse councils for any extra costs falling on them under the Act.

He said: "This is the right approach. And it confirms our commitment to take an open government available to all."

The announcement was welcomed by the other speakers in the debate. Maurice Frankel, director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, said: "It is a very important decision and it's a very positive sign for the legislation."

Janet Paraskeva, chief executive of The Law Society, said: "It's an important statement of the Government's commitment to the Act and to making it work for everyone."

She added: "It allows all of us access to more information about how government is done."

Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, said that the Act would cover over 100,000 public bodies. He said that there were 23 exemptions, 16 of which are qualified, meaning they would be subject to a public interest test.

Some delegates questioned how public interest would be defined, and whether ministers would be tempted to use their veto on the release of information. Others questioned whether the Act would conflict with the Data Protection Act.

Got something we should be writing about?
Get in touch with your news by e-mailing pastill@nep.co.uk

Back to the Analysis index





E-mail this story to a friend. Your name:

Your friend's e-mail:


tradeclips Jobsmake the next move in your journalism career Email bulletinsget latest news and jobs directly to your desktop Freelance indexsee our searchable list for freelance help CVadd your details to our journalism talent pool Dailywho owns it? who's the editor? Weeklysearch our vast database of local titles Your Paperwhat we've written about your newspaper Your Companywhat we've written about your company Blogsbest of the UK journalism blogs Resourcescontacts, web reviews, and terms unravelled Useful Linksour guide to the major industry organisations