AddThis SmartLayers

Football club bans weekly over stories on soccer school finances

A football club has banned a weekly newspaper after it carried a series of stories about the finances of a soccer school co-owned by the side’s chief executive.

The Derbyshire Times has been informed by Chesterfield FC it will no longer agree to requests for interviews with players, management and other “key personnel” at the club.

The ban comes after the Times ran stories about issues with the Chesterfield FC Player Progression Pathway (PPP) football school, owned by Chesterfield CEO Chris Turner and former non-league footballer Liam Sutcliffe.

The newspaper detailed the PPP’s £77,000 losses in their 2015 accounts and recent staff departures amid allegations of unpaid wages, as well as concerns for the welfare of young people on the programmes.

The Proact Stadium, home of Chesterfield FC

The Proact Stadium, home of Chesterfield FC

The club said it had received complaints from sponsors, commercial partners, suppliers and an educational provider who had been contacted by the Times.

In a statement , Chesterfield further claimed that for most of last season, no Times journalists attended games or pre-match press conferences and that officials were “disappointed” the paper did not cover an event staged to announce a record sponsorship deal.

In response, the Times said: “The Derbyshire Times devotes several pages of column inches every week to coverage of the Spireites – our website also carries dozens of stories, interviews and columns.

“We do not set out to be either positive or negative, we simply intend to report on the Spireites fairly, accurately and without fear or favour.

“Having said that anyone reviewing the DT’s coverage will see the majority is overwhelmingly positive so we are disappointed the club has taken this stance. We have covered recent developments at the PPP – although that organisation is not part of the club – and we feel it was entirely legitimate to cover the issues raised.

“We hope the club will reconsider the ban, which we do not believe is in any way justified. Until that point we will continue to do our very best to give our army of readers informed Chesterfield FC coverage.”

The full statement from Chesterfield FC reads: “Following a breakdown in its relationship with the Derbyshire Times, the club is unfortunately no longer in a position to agree to requests from the newspaper for interviews with players, management and other key personnel.

“The newspaper’s coverage of matters relating to two organisations associated with the club – the Player Progression Pathway and International Academy – has had a destabilising effect on the club. Complaints have been received from sponsors, commercial partners, suppliers and an educational provider, who have all been contacted by the newspaper.

“Club officials have co-operated with the Derbyshire Times in recent weeks by answering numerous questions relating to the club’s association with both organisations. At the same time, the club’s media department has continued to facilitate regular access to players, management and other senior figures at the club.

“Attempts have been made by club officials to maintain a good working relationship with the newspaper, despite the fact that for most of last season, no Derbyshire Times journalists attended Chesterfield games or pre-match press conferences. Furthermore, club officials were disappointed to note that the newspaper failed to provide coverage of an event staged to announce a club-record sponsorship deal, which was attended by other media outlets, sponsors and invited guests.

“The club enjoys a harmonious relationships with various local, national and international media organisations and it is with regret that this step has had to be taken.”

8 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • May 31, 2016 at 12:25 pm
    Permalink

    Well done Derbyshire Times! Don’t relent! People in football think they can rule the world instead of being amont the lowest form of life.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(8)
  • May 31, 2016 at 12:27 pm
    Permalink

    “…despite the fact that for most of last season, no Derbyshire Times journalists attended Chesterfield games or pre-match press conferences…”

    If this is true, it doesn’t sound as though a ban will make that much difference to the coverage.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(10)
  • May 31, 2016 at 1:43 pm
    Permalink

    Everybody believes in freedom of speech. Nobody practises it.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • May 31, 2016 at 5:08 pm
    Permalink

    “for most of last season, no Derbyshire Times journalists attended Chesterfield games or pre-match press conferences. Furthermore, club officials were disappointed to note that the newspaper failed to provide coverage of an event staged to announce a club-record sponsorship deal, which was attended by other media outlets . . .”

    I usually have no sympathy with whinging football clubs, but if their claim is true. . . what an indictment of the quality of the paper’s sports coverage

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • May 31, 2016 at 5:36 pm
    Permalink

    There are two things here. Firstly how petty the football club is ridiculous. Seemingly there is nothing inaccurate in the Times’ coverage as the statement from the club does not refute anything. I could go on but I won’t as the club’s stance is plainly daft – well done the Times on a good story.

    However, from a journalism point of view, why is the Times not covering interviews and pre-match conferences? Yes, the same recycled cliches are made, but there must be thousands of fans of the club living in the Times’ catchment area. Surely that has value for print, web and social media audiences?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(5)