AddThis SmartLayers

New sports editor unveils ‘dramatic’ new back-page look

A “dramatic” new look back page style featuring larger images has been introduced by a regional daily.

The Worcester News has begun moving away from its more traditional, multiple-story layout in what it says is a bid to “command readers’ attention.”

The new-look back pages have been introduced since the appointment of new sports editor James Reece, who took over the role after the retirement of Paul Ricketts in October.

James, who had previously served as Paul’s deputy, said the new style was an attempt to “set an agenda”.

Two examples of the "dramatic" new look Worcester News back pages

Two examples of the “dramatic” new look Worcester News back pages

He added: “Although this sort of presentation is common on national and big-city papers, it is a departure from the norm for us.

“It is dramatic, and it gives us a chance to make more of a statement than we could with our previous layouts.”

James said early reaction to the new look had been positive, with just one sports club press officer complaining: “It’s too sensational.”

An example of the News's previous back page layout

An example of the News’s previous back page layout

9 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • February 18, 2016 at 7:40 am
    Permalink

    Call me cynical, but: bigger pictures = less copy = less reporters.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(9)
  • February 18, 2016 at 8:02 am
    Permalink

    In fairness the ‘old’ back pages are awful. Not attractive at all.

    New ones are much better.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(3)
  • February 18, 2016 at 8:42 am
    Permalink

    Good pictures sell papers. Which is why you need good staff togs.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(6)
  • February 18, 2016 at 9:23 am
    Permalink

    Big improvement (except for the imaginary word “swordsplay” in the strap).
    …and it’s less copy = fewer reporters, FOPE.
    Anyone need a sub? No?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(1)
  • February 18, 2016 at 11:42 am
    Permalink

    They think the new look is ‘ too sensational’?
    Goodness me some folk are easily pleased/ shocked/ outraged ( delete as applicable) in worcester aren’t they

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(4)
  • February 18, 2016 at 3:08 pm
    Permalink

    Morgan – either that, or like many critics of local press, they don’t know what the word means…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • February 18, 2016 at 5:33 pm
    Permalink

    It definitely looks better but, as has been mentioned, there’s far less copy. There’s a balance to be found but they’ve overshot it.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(2)
  • February 20, 2016 at 9:00 am
    Permalink

    Pressure on the photographers then. Plus change the ugly fonts and the colour overload. However, the previous example shows why the regional press is heading downhill quicker than Franz Klammer – dull and uninspiring.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)