AddThis SmartLayers

Dyson at Large: Title earns praise in print and online

It’s not often that a non-journalist reader tries to grab my attention with positive news about their local newspaper.

And so I want to share the following email I received from Katie, in her late 20s from Essex, who works as a junior executive at a major construction firm.

“Local papers have a reputation for being stuffed with advertising and trivial news stories,” Katie told me after stumbling across Dyson at Large, “but the Brentwood Gazette is anything but!

“The paper always has relevant, engaging stories for the community – from local councillor gaffes, to whether the town will get its own Waitrose.

“I moved to the area around 12 months ago and it’s helped me to get to know my new home.

“And, most importantly to me, the Gazette is embracing the digital age with an active, up-to-the-moment Twitter account and a mobile-optimised website, meaning I can read local news on the go just like I do with the nationals.”

Katie’s praise prompted me to get hold of a Brentwood Gazette dated Wednesday 2 October, which by chance splashed on the latest stage of the supermarket story she’d mentioned: ‘Decision time: 127 flats or new Waitrose store?’

For once, I liked the used of red for ‘Decision time’, and I’ve always been a fan of using company brands and colours when relevant in headlines – the ‘Waitrose’ green in upper and lower case instantly telling readers who the story involved.

Taking care over headlines seems to be a must for Gazette subs, as plenty of them pulled me into readable stories with precise or intriguing information, such as:

  • ‘Bless this horse! Prayers said at four-legged service’, leading page three;
  • ‘Pickles tells abuse victim to ‘adjust your medication’’, leading page five;
  • ‘Saucy fiction’s no great thrill for blind readers’, leading page eight;
  • ‘Terrified horse with rider bolts park dog attack’, leading page nine; and
  • ‘Police boss to spend £230k on 5 new staff in his office’, leading page 11.

There was in-depth coverage of planning, politics, charity, local celebrity and community issues and events, although I felt a little uncomfortable at an absence of traditional ‘hard’ news.

I carefully read through the Gazette several times and could not find one court appearance or crime report, and was left wondering if this was an editorial decision or just the quirk of a quiet calls week.

This led me to follow reader Katie’s enthusiasm and visit the paper’s website, and on 10 October there were two ‘live’ crime stories on the opening page – ‘Two men arrested after theft of Porsche’ and ‘Man charged over train assault on grandfather’.

My blog is only a snapshot of the paper and website, of course, and so I’d be interested to have comments from Gazette editor Neville Wilson or his team on whether they are developing a ‘live’ approach for online and leaning towards analysis and timeless stories for print.

The Gazette is a former Northcliffe paper, and so if this is evidence of a wider Local World editorial policy then I’d also welcome enlightening comments and any web statistics from David Montgomery, only last week announced as taking more of a hands-on control as chief executive, following Steve Auckland’s departure.

Whatever the strategy, at first glance it doesn’t seem to have done the title’s print circulation any harm: it was recorded at 14,864 a week in the last six months of 2012, a best-performing increase of +29.5pc.

However, it should be noted that only 66pc of this total were sold at 75p a time (it’s now 90p), the rest being free pick-ups, and so perhaps someone else can tell us which way the paid-for and free trends are heading.

Gazette reader Katie also applauded the title’s Twitter activity, and I noted that @Gazetteseries tweeted 25 times on 10 October, had total tweets of 3,049 and 3,505 followers; any thoughts on these efforts?

More statistics: in a 60-page main paper, there were 140-plus tales on 35 news and letters pages, 21 reports on four sports pages, and around 50 stories in a 24-page ‘go!’ lifestyle pull-out, plus a 28-page Homes pull-out.

But the last word should go to Katie, whose postscript to her email highlighted the quality of a recent Gazette story: “This local councillor gaffe story went national.”

A great story – and without our local papers, where would it have come from?

14 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • October 16, 2013 at 7:21 am
    Permalink

    Mmm, let’s look at ‘Katie’s’ quotes:
    ‘Mobile-optimised website so I can read news on the go’.
    The ‘gaffe story went national’.
    ‘Relevant, engaging stories for the community.’
    “An active, up-to-the-moment Twitter account.’
    “Embracing the digital age.’
    I don’t know about anyone else, but these are EXACTLY the kinds of phrases I hear non-journalists dropping into conversation down my local boozer every night. Every single night. *Rubs chin.*
    Whilst I suspect somebody’s puling a fast one on Steve, the Gazette is a good paper and clearly has a lot of imaginative off-diary stories (sorry, ‘engaging content’.)
    However, as for the sales direction can’t Steve do his own research and just compare two ABC certificates, noting how many free copies were given away each time, to give the genuine circulation performance?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 7:37 am
    Permalink

    Think you are right Guv. Something’s not right here.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 7:48 am
    Permalink

    Indeed. That’s a remarkably well-informed ‘reader’!

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 9:05 am
    Permalink

    Guys, guys – why so cynical? Only yesterday I took a call from a lady who introduced herself as one of my unique daily browsers. She said she was absolutely delighted that I was now engaging with her 24/7 across our seamlessly integrated portfolio of products.
    Why on earth should anyone doubt that a young lady working for a construction firm should just stumble across an irregular column on a niche website?
    And surely it is merely a happy coincidence that, once here, she was so effusive and knowledgeable in her praise of the Gazette. Let’s celebrate, not snipe.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 9:36 am
    Permalink

    A hilarious con!!! Oh Mr Dyson… looks like you’ve been caught out hook line and sinker

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 10:35 am
    Permalink

    Stung! ‘Katie, in her late 20s from Essex, who works as a junior executive at a major construction firm’. Yeah right. Er, did she email with a gmail/hotmail address by any chance?

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 10:57 am
    Permalink

    Oo, you cynics! But I like you for it. As I hope you’d expect, I didn’t rely on email, and know who Katie is, where she works, etc, as fact. Perhaps ‘stumbled across’ the site was not quite accurate; she found it online after meeting me on a communications course I ran.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 11:01 am
    Permalink

    I’ve no idea whether the original correspondent with Steve is anything other than who she says she is, but there are people – like me – with no involvement in the media but who take an interest in what their local papers are doing.

    I chose the word “their” deliberately: we see the paper as being there for our benefit, and so what happens to it matters to us. Too many comments on this niche website show little or no regard for readers – some of whom manage to try to keep informed even when the local paper isn’t providing a great deal of information.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 11:02 am
    Permalink

    Hang on Steve, doesn’t that change the whole basis of this review? There is a world of difference between meeting somebody on a communications course – who, taking a wild guess, is probably interested in communications and familiar with the jargon that goes with it – and claiming to have received an email out of the blue from a Gazette reader. I think the Gazette is a good paper, but you’ve done Nev’s team no favours really by pushing the comments down this route.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 12:02 pm
    Permalink

    Aside from the issues mentioned above, thank you for providing a much better overview of what this team actually achieves. As a former Northcliffe/Local World employee, I have had the pleasure of working with Neville and know how hard his team works.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 12:07 pm
    Permalink

    It’s not often that a non-journalist reader tries to grab my attention with positive news about their local newspaper. (Unless I meet them on a course and ask them to read my blog and review their local paper)

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 12:16 pm
    Permalink

    Point 2: Katie clearly isn’t any old junior exec; she’s in marketing and/or PR, so she should be expected to take an interest in her local paper.
    Point 2: Northcliffe, under Steve Auckland, abandoned its subbing hubs and the result was a return to well-designed papers with decent headlines and a degree of local knowledge. From what Steve Dyson says, the Gazette has a clear local plan for its area and it seems to be working, but much of what he praises is down to subbing (I dare not say the subs – chances are there’s only one!). Now he’s gone I dread to think what will happen in Local World. Make the most of your Gazette, Katie; I fear it won’t last in its present form…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 16, 2013 at 12:47 pm
    Permalink

    Irrespective of the debate above, the Gazette’s a really good paper, staffed by a team who clearly put a lot of thought and effort into the content. I’ve worked with Nev before and am glad to see he is still full of ideas.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • October 18, 2013 at 11:10 am
    Permalink

    Thanks to all for comments, cynics and all! Seriously, good points always taken aboard. That said, I do think the comments by ‘streatham2′ are worth considering…

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)