AddThis SmartLayers

Press Association pays out for ‘lifting’ interview

The Press Association has agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to a freelance news agency after it ‘lifted’ an exclusive interview with murder victim Jo Yeates’ father.

Solent News and Photo Agency, backed by the National Association of Press Agencies, took on PA after the wire service lifted and distributed the interview word-for-word.

Solent had distributed the first story on 28 December to a number of selected publications including the Southern Daily Echo.

Shortly after they had filed, its staff noticed that the story has been been reproduced on the Daily Mirror website. The story featured each and every one of the agency quotes, but quoted Mr Yeates as having ‘told the Southern Daily Echo.’

However PA argued it had acted in good faith and refused to withdraw the story. Editor Jonathan Grun said: “We do not recognise the interpretation of the matter as outlined in Solent’s colourful press release.

“The quotes from Jo Yeates’s family were in the public domain on a newspaper website and were clearly attributed in our story.

“When Solent’s copyright in the quotes was asserted we reached a mutually satisfactory settlement. We believe that we acted in good faith on a sensitive story involving the parents of a murder victim.”

With the backing of the NAPA the case was then referred to specialist media lawyers and a settlement has now been reached. The money will be donated to a journalists’ charity.

David Holt of Solent said: “This was never about money. It was about journalistic practice and, to some extent, the future of journalism, particularly on the internet.

“Our work seems to have been blithely copied and pasted by someone sat at a computer miles away from the subject of the story, in this case grieving relatives, and put out for consumption, apparently without a second thought.

“This wasn’t a case of someone grabbing a couple of quotes. It was a wholesale lift. We had filed 237 words, the piece by PA which was published in numerous newspapers and websites was 241 words and included the attribute ‘told the Southern Daily Echo,’ which was of course wrong.

“We ended-up head to head with PA’s lawyers. They tried to tell us that they had every right, that we did not have a case and even threatened to sue us if we dared to suggest that there was anything untoward.”

NAPA enlisted the services of specialist IP lawyer Bill Lister of Pannone LLP, who engaged with PA’s lawyers. This iresulted in a full written settlement with PA in which the wire service agreed to pay Solent and NAPA’s legal costs in full.

7 comments

You can follow all replies to this entry through the comments feed.
  • August 3, 2011 at 1:30 pm
    Permalink

    Well done Solent. PA’s arrogance in this case has been astonishing. Lifting a story wholesale is outrageous, and as Denis Cassidy says this was an important matter of principle. How could any news agencies be expected to survive if PA was allowed to copy and paste their work? PA should also be ashamed of their failure to comment. An apology is in order.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • August 3, 2011 at 4:07 pm
    Permalink

    I genuinely believe PA is the worst thing to happen to local and regional newspapers in our history – worse than the internet.

    More often than not now, holes in papers are filled by reporters chained to their desk rewriting PA copy instead of going out and finding something local.

    The whole industry vies to be “first” with a story when in fact all they have managed to do is dopy and paste it from PA before anyone else – something a trained monkey would be able to do without much difficulty.

    As Rob has said, the arrogance of PA in this case is outrageous. I hope that even if they don’t learn, others who have suffered similar plagiarism do and pursue similar action. Bravo Solent.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • August 4, 2011 at 10:18 am
    Permalink

    You have to laugh when you see the national association of news agencies complaining about their content being lifted.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • August 4, 2011 at 10:47 am
    Permalink

    Priceless quote from the David Holt of Solent News Agency…

    “Our work seems to have been blithely copied and pasted by someone sat at a computer miles away from the subject of the story, in this case grieving relatives, and put out for consumption, apparently without a second thought”.

    Re-arrange these word Kettle, Calling, Black, Pot, the……

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • August 4, 2011 at 11:58 am
    Permalink

    My staff work hard for their exclusive stories only for lazy agencies to blatantly rip them off word for word and flog them to nationals. One in particular even had the cheek to ring us last week and ask us to help them plagiarise our work. Some agencies, not all, simply have no shame and no class.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • August 4, 2011 at 2:44 pm
    Permalink

    ‘weekly editor’ – oh, boo hoo. If your reporters want to make it to the top then they’ll be flogging their own stories to the nationals or doing deals with the agencies anyway. Stop whining.

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)
  • August 4, 2011 at 3:42 pm
    Permalink

    With fewer staff than ever working for local papers, they hardly have time to write their own stories, let alone flog them.
    If agency hacks were any good they’d be working for the nationals!

    Report this comment

    Like this comment(0)